Lipoatrophia
Semicircularis:
a new office disease?
900 cases reported in Belgium
Click here for word document
Lipoatrophia Semicircularis: a new office disease?
Curvers
Bart *, M D, occupational physician; Maes Annemarie **, Ph D, senior
researcher
Short running title: Lipoatrophia Semicircularis
* KBC Bank & Insurance Group, Medical Services, Havenlaan 2, B-1080
Brussels Belgium
** VITO (Flemish Institute for Technological Research), Expertise
Center of Environmental Toxicology, Boeretang 200, B- 2400 Mol, Belgium
Corresponding
author:
Bart L. Curvers
KBC Bank & Insurance Group
Medical Services
Havenlaan 2
B- 1080 Brussels
Belgium
Phone: + 32 2
429 85 00
Fax: + 32 2 429 81 50
Email: bart.curvers@kbc.be
Abstract
The medical literature describes lipoatrophia semicircularis
as a rare, idiopathic condition, that consists clinically of a semicircular
zone of atrophy of the subcutaneous fatty tissue located mostly on
the front of the thighs. The disorder is mainly afflicting office
workers. Since 1995, we have diagnosed more than 900 cases in our
company. Also in other companies (national and international) lipoatrophia
semicircularis is diagnosed.
Several hypothesis were proposed, but no one could explain the symptoms.
Although the exact cause is still unknown, we believe that electromagnetic
fields play an important role in this phenomenon.
Introduction
Lipoatrophia
semicircularis (LS) consists clinically of a semicircular zone of
atrophy of the subcutaneous fatty tissue located mostly on the legs.
Skin and underlying muscles remains intact. It is important to distinguish
between the annular form of lipoatrophia and the acquired forms which
develop as a consequence of injections.(1,2)
The phenomenon
was reported for the first time in three patients in 1974 by Gschwandtner
and Munzberger.(3,4) Since then, there have been some publications,
but these relate only to 70-odd patients, whereas in our bank and
insurance group we have had several hundreds cases.
Till now the
aethiology of LS is unknown, the literature is mainly descriptive
and as regards aetiology very hypothetical. The cause of LS remains
so far speculative, most authors invariably hypothesize local mechanical
pressure (microtraumata caused by either repetitive pressure against
an object or by wearing tight clothing) as being on its origin.(3-12)
Clinical
observations and pathology
Our
story is a remarkable one. In the Spring of 1995, a total of 1100
-bank employees moved to our new office building in Brussels. The
building was equipped with new data cabling, new furniture and new
telephones, though most of the computer equipment was the same equipment
used in our previous premises. In June 1995, a number of women were
diagnosed with lipoatrophia semicircularis (LS) for the first time.
Six months later, as many as 135 persons had developed this disorder
and at the time of writing, nearly 8 years on, we have registrated
more than 900 cases. In our local branches and other companies, too,
there are increasingly more incidences of this problem. Also in other
countries (e.g. France, Italy, U.K. and the Netherlands) LS is diagnosed.(16
- 20)
The disorder is mainly and mostly exclusively afflicting administrative
(computer working) people.
Typically, the
lipoatrophic zone is localized on the anterolateral side of the thigh,
72 cm above the floor (data gathered on patients wearing shoes) -
72 cm is also the standard height of our office furniture. The lesion
can be uni- or bilateral and is between 5 and 20 cm long, about 2
cm wide and 1 to 5 mm deep. The skin remains intact.(fig. 1,2,3) By
the onset of the lesions (mostly 2 or 3 months after moving into a
new office), some patients mentioned a feeling of heaviness, some
experienced a tingling or burning sensation, while others suffered
from an increased degree of fatigue.
The lesions could disappear spontaneously after several months, but
mostly improved only when people moved to another location in the
building, were absent from work for a long time or were on maternity
leave. However, the atrophy would come back when they returned to
work in the same environment.
LS seems to be reversible. 95% of the retired employees, have no more
lesions one year after leaving the company.
In anatomopathological
research a perivascular lymphocytic infiltration is observed in the
initial phase. In the next phase, there is a decrease in both the
volume and number of adipocytes and after that a gradual replacement
of the adipocytes by connective tissue. The adipocytes are reabsorbed
by lysosomally active macrophages.(18 -19, 21 - 22) It is not clear
whether the macrophages are the cause (by producing cytokines) or
the consequence of cell destruction.
Echography, MRI
or EMG research did not reveal any other abnormalities.
Personal data
were recorded and from these it emerged that 84% of the disorders
occurred in women, that the pathology was distributed over age groups
in accordance with the employees' age pyramid and that there was no
link with any other medical disorder among the employees affected.
Discussion
So far, the aethiology of lipoatrophia semicircularis is
not known. The literature is mainly descriptive and very hypothetical
as regards aethiology. LS must be due to a new additional factor to
which people are exposed in their working environment.The lesions
mostly appeared within 2 or 3 moths after moving to a new working
environment.
Several
authors go no further than microtraumata caused by either
repetitive pressure against one object or another or by tight clothing.(9
- 12) However, this reason is too simple to explain the problem we
have experienced since 1995. Firstly, if local pressure is the cause
of lipoatrophia, it is amazing that we have had to wait until now
to see this pathology. Secondly, local pressure can cause a local
impression, but this will always disappear minutes or hours after
exposure and has no relation to atrophia of the fatty tissue.
Explanations
have also been sought in the area of blood circulation.
The hypothesis
of an anatomical variant has been proposed in which the A.circumflexa
femoris lateralis originates on the A. femoralis and not on the A.
profunda femoralis.( 9) As a result, the A. circumflexa femoris
lateralis is more distally located, so that pressure is exerted
on this artery when a person sits down, giving rise to an ischaemic
atrophy on the front of the thigh. From a purely anatomical point
of view, pressure on a small part of the thigh seems to be a barely
credible explanation, but most significantly this anatomical variant
is found to exist in only about 3% of the population. This theory
is therefore untenable when account is taken of the large size of
our patient group.In one of our buildings, more than 30% of the employees
was affected!
Using the same
line of reasoning, it has been expounded that excessively intense
muscular activity when swivelling around in
an office chair could result in ischaemia in the subcutis. EMG research
(see above) has revealed that a floor covered in linoleum required
far less muscular strength to move about on than was the case with
a carpeted floor. With carpeting, up to 80% of the maximum muscular
strength of the M. Quadriceps and 50% of the strength of the hamstrings
is used; with linoleum these values are one-third lower. Therefore,
it was decided to conduct an experiment by replacing wall-to-wall
carpeting with linoleum. This operation did not yield any clinical
results.
Because
the sitting posture and particular characteristics of
the chair could have an influence on the compression pressure
on the distal side of the back of the thigh and therefore might cause
a vascular disturbance, an ergonomic investigation focusing on the
sitting position was carried out by the University of Louvain.(13)
The tables and chairs complied with ergonomic guidelines, but on the
whole the staff were seen to sit fairly high and not to make use of
the arm- and back rests, even though the chair was equipped with these
features. In an analysis of body posture (the aim of which was to
avoid musculoskeletal complaints), it was established that more than
half of the employees did not make use of the lumbar backrest, bent
the head far forward when working and assumed a fairly static body
posture; just under half of the workers did not use any rest for the
forearms.
Further investigations were carried out on 21 workers (11 with and
10 without LS).(13) A video analysis was made of postures and movements
and an electromyographic measurement was made in order to study the
muscular tension on the front and the back of the thigh. In addition,
a technological study of the pressure conditions below the thighs
was carried out by using a 42x42 cm pressure pad which contained a
grid of 512 capacitive sensors. From the video recordings and the
electromyographic observations it clearly emerged that persons with
Ls moved less, sat further forward on the chair and had a tendency
to sit too high. The pressure measurements demonstrated that pressure
increased by more than 30% at the distal extremity of the thigh when
the seat of the chair was 5 cm too high in relation to the ideal height
and that a footrest was a very good way of addressing this problem.
When the seat is tilted forward (i.e. an open angle), pressure is
at its lowest. However, the research demonstrated that there was no
difference between those who suffered from lipoatrophia and those
who did not.
It was decided to remedy this by offering those who were interested
an individual assessment of their own sitting posture. 176 employees
were surveyed, which led to an improvement of the posture at work
and a decrease in musculoskeletal complaints in a number of staff
members, but did not bring about any improvement of the phenomenon
of LS.
Recently, a new
study on sitting was carried out. The hypothesis was that a bad sitting
posture causes shearing forces on the back of the thigh, which can
cause an ischeamic zone on the front side of the leg, thus leading
to lipoatrophia. This study was carried out with the University of
Rotterdam (Nl), but failed to come up with a solution to our problem.(14)
In our situation, the following question arises: what has changed
in the work situation as a result of the move to the new premises?
The more obvious new factors were the building, furniture and wiring.
A large-scale technical research project was carried out.
A specialized firm of consultants conducted an investigation into
indoor air quality: The degree of dust creation was
considered to be good or very good everywhere; the CO2 content was
not above 600 ppm anywhere; the microbiological quality was good,
including the concentrations of endotoxins. Thermal comfort was good,
but the relative humidity was too low (around 40%). The ozone content
in the surrounding air never reached 0.01 ppm and the radon content
above ground remained under 20 Bq/m³ and below ground 40-70 Bq/m³,
where the limit value in dwellings is 150 Bq/m³. Radioactivity
in the building did not exceed the measurements for the surrounding
environment.
A pilot study for electric and magnetic fields was carried
out, first at the frequency of 50 Hz.(15) The magnetic field fluctuated
for the most part around 0.2 mG, with an occasional value of 2 mG,
the recommended maximum. The electric field ranged up to 150 V/m for
a non-earthed cable conduit full of cables; when the cable conduit
was earthed, the value never exceeded the standard value of 16 V/m.
The electric field strengths were always appreciably higher when someone
was seated at the workstation than when not. From the findings of
this research, a proposal was made to earth all workstations. The
clinical results of this earthing have been conspicuous by their absence.
A subsequent study included the VLF and LF fields, as well as the
ULF or microwave frequencies at 915 and 2450 MHz. No abnormally high
magnetic field strengths were observed anywhere, compared with the
generally accepted underground load or limit values.
Another hypothesis related to electrostatical discharge (ESD)
to the thighs via the desk top.(26 - 27) In this hypothesis, the conductivity
of the desk top plays a mayor role; the surface resistance varies
from 20x10 to 1x10.ohms according to the material and finish of the
desk tops examined. Preferably, they should be as low as possible.
Local electrostatic discharges on that region of the legs, where the
human body is coupled with the edge of the table, can in a biological
plausible way explain what is happening in the lipoatrophic tissue.
Activated macrophages produce cytokines; e.g. TNFa that is able to
damage adipocytes and modify the structure of adipose tissue.(22 -
25)( fig.4) Extensive experiments have been carried out with ALU plate
and ALU post in which data and other cables are stored, but all experiments
failed to produce any noteworthy results.
A new pilot project in the electromagnetic domain was
recently completed. The goal was to limit the amount of litter on
the cable network. To this end, the entire cabling (for the PC network,
telephones and electricity) on one floor was replaced with ferrite
cables. This has drastically reduced the litter and the electromagnetic
fields it creates. There has been a clear improvement in the condition
of those employees affected by LS. In some cases there has been a
complete recovery. To-date, this is the only trial to have given
a positive result for all those affected. This reinforces
our belief that the cause of LS should be sought in the area of electromagnetics.
(27)
Conclusion
This report sets
out the history of a remarkable problem, a problem we are still trying
to find a solution to. Although this disease is catalogued as a very
rare one, it is now occurring very frequently at least in certain
workplaces.
We may concluded that the frequent occurrence of lipoatrophia semicircularis
is directly related to modern new office buildings and new working
environments. Probably the cause as well as the solution is a multifactorial
one. Although the cause is still unknown, we believe that electromagnetic
fields play an important role in this phenomenon.


Fig. 1,2 and 3 : Semicircular zones of lipoatrophia
on the front of the
thighs

Fig. 4 : Biological
hypothesis of the atrophia of the subcutaneous fatty tissue.
REFERENCES
1. Atlan-Gepner C, Bongrand P, Farnarier C, Xerri L, Choux R, Gauthier
J.F,Brue T,Vague P, Grob JJ, Vialettes B. Insulin-induced lipoatrophy
in type I diabetes.Diabetes Care.1996; 9: 1283-1285.
2. Imamura S, Taniguchi S. Lipoatrophic lesions preceded by pain and
erythema a new clinical entity? Eur. J. Dermatol. 2000; 10: 540-541
3. Gschwandtner
WR, Münzberger H. Lipoatrophia semicircularis. Ein Beitrag zu
bandförmig-circulären Atrophien des subcutanen Fettgewebes
im Extremitätenbereich. Der Hautartz 1974; 25: 222-227
4. Gschwandtner
WR, Münzberger H. Lipoatrophia semicircularis. Wiener klein.
Wochenschr. 1975; 87: 164-168.
5. Karavitsas
C, Miller JA, Kirby JD. Semicircular lipoatrophy. Brit. J. Dermatolol.
1981; 105: 591-593.
6. Ayale F, Lembo
G, Ruggiero F, Balato N; Lipoatrophia semicircularis,report of a case.
Dermatologica 1985; 170:101-103.
7. De Rie MA.
Indrukken op de bovenbenen ; Lipoatrophia semicircularis. Ned. Tijdschr.
Geneesk. 1998; 142: 796-797.
8. Nagore E,
Sanchez-Motilla JM, Rodriguez-Serna M, Vilata JJ, Aliaga A. Lipoatrophia
semicircularis- a traumatic panniculitis : report of seven cases and
review of the literature. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1998; 39: 879-881.
9. Bloch PH,
Runne U. Lipoatrophia semicircularis bein Mann. Zusammentreffen von
Arterienvarietaät und Microtraumata als mögliche Krankheitsursache.
Der Hautartz 1978; 29: 270-277.
10. Mascaro JM,
Ferrando J. The perils of wearing jeans: Lipoatrophia semicircularis.
Int. J. Dermatol. 1983; 22: 333.
11. Hodak E,
David M, Sandbank M. Semicircular lipoatrophy - a pressure-induced
lipoatrophy? Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1990; 15: 464-465.
12. De Groot
AC. Is lipoatrophia semicircularis induced by pressure? Brit. J. Dermatol.
1994; 131: 887-890.
13. Hermans V,
Hautekiet M, Haex B, Spaepen AJ, Van der Perre G. Lipoatrophia semicircularis
and the relation with office work. Appl. Ergonomics 1999; 30: 319-324.
14. Verbelen
C. Lipoatrophia semicircularis in relatie met zitten vanuit het biomechanisch
model. BMA Ergonomics 2002.
15. Decat G.
Evaluatie van de elektromagnetische velden in de werkomgeving van
het hoofd- en enkele bijkantoren van de Kredietbank. Vito report 1997;
TAP.RV97035.
16. Senecal S,
Victor V, Choudat D, Hornez-Davin S, Conso F. Semicircular lipoatrophy:
18 cases in the same company. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42: 101-120.
17. Gruber PC,
Fuller LC. Lipoatrophy semicircularis induced by trauma. Clin. Exper.
Dermatol. 2001; 26: 269-271.
18. Schnitzler
L, Verret J.-L, Titon J.-P. La lipoatrophie semi-circulaire des cuisses.
Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 1980; 107: 421-426.
19. Pibouin M,
Laudren A, Mignard MH, Chevrant-Breton J. Lipoatrophie semi-circulaire
des cuisses. Sem. Hop. Paris 1986 ; 62 : 3760-3762.
20. Filona G,
Bugatti L, Nicolini M, Ciattaglia G; Lipoatrofia semicircolare: due
casi. Unita Operativa di Dermatologia Ospedale " A. Murri"
ASL
21. Dahl PR,
Zalla MJ, Winkelmann RK. Localized involutional lipoatrophy: a clinicopathologic
study of 16 patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996; 35: 523-528.
22. Zalla MJ,
Winkelmann RK, Gluck OS. Involutional lipoatrophy: macrophage-related
involution of fat lobules. Dermatology 1995; 191: 149-153.
23. Petruschke
Th, Hauner H. Tumor necrosis factor-a prevents the differentiation
of human adipocyte precursor cells and causes delipidation of newly
developed fat cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabolism 1993 ; 76 : 742-747.
24. Prins JB,
Niesler CU, Winterford CM, Bright NA, Siddle K, O'Rahilly S, Walker
NI, Cameron DP. Tumor necrosis factor-a induces apoptosis of human
adipose cells. Diabetes 1997; 46: 1939-1944.
25. Gamaley I,
Augsten K, Berg H. Electrostimulation of macrophage NADPH oxidase
by modulated high-frequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochem.
Bioenerget. 1995; 38: 415-418.
26. Maes A,.Verschaeve
L. Contractverslag L 3211 2000/TOX/R/002 VITO Boeretang 200 B-2400
Mol
27. Maes A, Curvers
B, Verschaeve L. Lipoatrophia semicircularis: the electromagnetic
hypothesis. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 2003; 22 (2), in
press.